Above all

Search in this blog:

martes, 6 de noviembre de 2012

NO HISTORY LIVES ARE misfits

NO HISTORY LIVES ARE misfits.
Mankind not to walk the same path many times, is somehow turning his steps in legends or reviews as a memory element that serves to not re-sign have in the future or it can be your present. But what's the story? To be more accurate we will go to the encyclopedic dictionary Herder. This for some may not tell us we're wrong and if the dictionary was wrong, surely they can make their case to rebut, not to me if not to the scientific community that developed this reference tool.
Let's not etymology, because our partners confundiríamos IICA are now municipal authorities in the province where he was born Cesar Vallejo and Luis de la Puente Uceda, we refer to what our dictionary slogan: "research, science, describe, investigate, in Aristotle (knowledge of the individual) Set of events that happened in the past referable to man (meaning the deeds res) and research and description of these past events themselves (meaning historiam Gestarum rerum). The first meaning refers to the reality of man is developed, as a social individual, in time, refers ultimately to the historicity of human existence. The second refers to the knowledge of this reality, the story of what happens, in this second sense is also given the name of historiography. "In the story I also conceive as parousia, is the harbinger of things to come in future, it gives us clues to what may happen. But it said Mr Mayor. He did it by referring to a group of citizens who oppose the destruction a monument to the solidarity between peoples, a small pediatric wards than necessity became general hospital due to growing demand in the Andean town. The sensible thing would have been to return to the small hospital his condition for which it was built, that is only for the care of infants and pregnant women. But the intention is another, that we know, a people without knowledge of their history, and no history of dictators is grass so can be easily looted. But do not think this is started recently. The Iberians began grabbing our language. I will give an example: the lion would happen if you forget to sign your system and teach him to speak like birds?, Could communicate again with their peers, or with other lions?
Therefore see which is the object of history. The object of this science are man's past deeds (not nature, because in this case it would be only a "natural history", as called in the s. Eighteenth descriptive research on the nature, and not a "human history"), but not any kind of facts, but precisely those deemed socially or politically relevant: the res gestae publicae, not private things, of the first, not the second, the story is built. It is essential to this science being a chronological narrative and objective events, temporality, therefore, of the facts in its linear events, where it is possible to establish cause and effect, and not of mere succession, trying while interpretation and explanation thereof.

Against a historical positivism, however, based on an exclusive focus on the facts and a timeline consisting of objective facts, as far as possible, and in the study of causality that governs them, the "School of the Annals "which owes its origin to the" Annales d'histoire économique et sociale ", founded in 1929 by Lucien Febvre (1878-1956) and Marc Bloch (1886-1944), posed rather the need to address the internal structures society, such as economy, culture, social groups, social relations, etc.., study objects that are more amenable to treatment than simple scientific events. Anyway, even called in as science, particularly by the use of a rigorous methodology for research, history belongs to the type of science called idiographic as opposed to nomothetic, or to all human sciences, Dilthey in expression or human sciences in general. He discussed the possibility of using the assumptions experimentation and prediction of events, but is credited with the ability to understand the consequences of man's temporal power and even capture somehow, "life" human. In fact, historical interpretation, the historical method, is one aspect of hermeneutics.
The type of scientific explanation used in the historical sciences is typical of genetic models and functional or teleological
(Dictionary of Philosophy on CD-ROM. Copyright © 1996. Herder Publishing Company SA, Barcelona. All rights reserved. ISBN 84-254-1991-3. Authors: Jordi Morato and Antoni Martínez Cortés Riu.)
An authority, expressing the opposite, or put it as an argument to oppose his critics, it is undesirable as it would explicitly telling the whims of his mercy, and it only lived in the colony with pongajes, the mills and parcels which by the way happened more than a century and we go to the second we divested of colonialism. What I see is a lack of democratic culture. But beware, it is preached by the mass media, is just the opposite. What they extol is the dictatorship of the big bourgeoisie and its ideology neoliberal phase. Its principles are the very opposite of what democracy is based on Socrates Greek, or in other words the democratic ideal of Socrates, pun intended. Then shout themselves hoarse democracy that our media is not democracy, if not the dictatorship of the media owned by the big bourgeoisie. As Socrates said the democratic ideal that all human means in a public square dirimamos the commonplace, without religion involved in it, the military ideal, which says that our little Greek philosopher and great gods, spirits of our leaders and our money, say their altars outside the square, the agora where we will discuss all issues. This is the paradox of democracy, however simple that even my recent Peruvian students understand me, but minus the local authorities either as national, the latter prefer the cruelest dictatorship. For true democracy is the struggle of ideas in the agora, without imposing the criterion by the will of religion or military law. There is no absolute truth, everything is relative, depending on many criteria or circumstances. So the story serves to show that reality is changing with the elapse of time. Although time is the most referenced on circumstantial because it moves humanity. Therefore esan and rulers should watch history forever.
Juan Esteban Yupanqui Villalobos.http://juanestebanyupanqui.blogspot.com

Here I am...