NO HISTORY LIVES ARE misfits.
Mankind
not to walk the same path many times, is somehow turning his steps in
legends or reviews as a memory element that serves to not re-sign have
in the future or it can be your present. But what's the story? To be more accurate we will go to the encyclopedic dictionary Herder. This
for some may not tell us we're wrong and if the dictionary was wrong,
surely they can make their case to rebut, not to me if not to the
scientific community that developed this reference tool.
Let's
not etymology, because our partners confundiríamos IICA are now
municipal authorities in the province where he was born Cesar Vallejo
and Luis de la Puente Uceda, we refer to what our dictionary slogan:
"research, science, describe, investigate, in Aristotle
(knowledge of the individual) Set of events that happened in the past
referable to man (meaning the deeds res) and research and description of
these past events themselves (meaning historiam Gestarum rerum). The
first meaning refers to the reality of man is developed, as a social
individual, in time, refers ultimately to the historicity of human
existence. The
second refers to the knowledge of this reality, the story of what
happens, in this second sense is also given the name of historiography.
"In the story I also conceive as parousia, is the harbinger of things to
come in future, it gives us clues to what may happen. But it said Mr Mayor. He
did it by referring to a group of citizens who oppose the destruction a
monument to the solidarity between peoples, a small pediatric wards
than necessity became general hospital due to growing demand in the
Andean town. The
sensible thing would have been to return to the small hospital his
condition for which it was built, that is only for the care of infants
and pregnant women. But
the intention is another, that we know, a people without knowledge of
their history, and no history of dictators is grass so can be easily
looted. But do not think this is started recently. The Iberians began grabbing our language. I
will give an example: the lion would happen if you forget to sign your
system and teach him to speak like birds?, Could communicate again with
their peers, or with other lions?
Therefore see which is the object of history. The
object of this science are man's past deeds (not nature, because in
this case it would be only a "natural history", as called in the s.
Eighteenth descriptive research on the nature, and not a
"human history"), but not any kind of facts, but precisely those deemed
socially or politically relevant: the res gestae publicae, not private
things, of the first, not the second, the story is built. It
is essential to this science being a chronological narrative and
objective events, temporality, therefore, of the facts in its linear
events, where it is possible to establish cause and effect, and not of
mere succession, trying while interpretation and explanation thereof.
Against
a historical positivism, however, based on an exclusive focus on the
facts and a timeline consisting of objective facts, as far as possible,
and in the study of causality that governs them, the "School of the
Annals "which
owes its origin to the" Annales d'histoire économique et sociale ",
founded in 1929 by Lucien Febvre (1878-1956) and Marc Bloch (1886-1944),
posed rather the need to address the internal structures society,
such as economy, culture, social groups, social relations, etc.., study
objects that are more amenable to treatment than simple scientific
events. Anyway,
even called in as science, particularly by the use of a rigorous
methodology for research, history belongs to the type of science called
idiographic as opposed to nomothetic, or to all human sciences, Dilthey
in expression or human sciences in general. He
discussed the possibility of using the assumptions experimentation and
prediction of events, but is credited with the ability to understand the
consequences of man's temporal power and even capture somehow, "life" human. In fact, historical interpretation, the historical method, is one aspect of hermeneutics.
The type of scientific explanation used in the historical sciences is typical of genetic models and functional or teleological
(Dictionary
of Philosophy on CD-ROM. Copyright © 1996. Herder Publishing Company
SA, Barcelona. All rights reserved. ISBN 84-254-1991-3. Authors: Jordi
Morato and Antoni Martínez Cortés Riu.)
An
authority, expressing the opposite, or put it as an argument to oppose
his critics, it is undesirable as it would explicitly telling the whims
of his mercy, and it only lived in the colony with pongajes, the mills
and parcels which by the way happened more than a century and we go to the second we divested of colonialism. What I see is a lack of democratic culture. But beware, it is preached by the mass media, is just the opposite. What they extol is the dictatorship of the big bourgeoisie and its ideology neoliberal phase. Its
principles are the very opposite of what democracy is based on Socrates
Greek, or in other words the democratic ideal of Socrates, pun
intended. Then
shout themselves hoarse democracy that our media is not democracy, if
not the dictatorship of the media owned by the big bourgeoisie. As
Socrates said the democratic ideal that all human means in a public
square dirimamos the commonplace, without religion involved in it, the
military ideal, which says that our little Greek philosopher and great
gods, spirits of our leaders and our money, say their altars outside the square, the agora where we will discuss all issues. This
is the paradox of democracy, however simple that even my recent
Peruvian students understand me, but minus the local authorities either
as national, the latter prefer the cruelest dictatorship. For
true democracy is the struggle of ideas in the agora, without imposing
the criterion by the will of religion or military law. There is no absolute truth, everything is relative, depending on many criteria or circumstances. So the story serves to show that reality is changing with the elapse of time. Although time is the most referenced on circumstantial because it moves humanity. Therefore esan and rulers should watch history forever.
Juan Esteban Yupanqui Villalobos.http://juanestebanyupanqui.blogspot.com