Above all

Tribute to Levón Ovanézov who died on 09.04.2020

Interview with a Bulgarian who participated in the resistance against fascism in the middle of the 20th century. A man dedicated to helping people, who opened his house and made it the House of chess, where athletes from all countries, ages, and all political currents gathered to collaborate on behalf of the best future of peoples. The post is in his tribute to Levón Ovanézov who died on 09.04.2020, he was a close friend of Juan Yupanqui. Its a big lost..

Search in this blog:

jueves, 6 de junio de 2013

GUZMAN, Varguitas AND METAPHYSICS.

GUZMAN, Varguitas AND METAPHYSICS.
Science, in its way of knowing, is what is currently in crisis. But some still assert dogmatically liberal and neo Mr of Aunt Julia, there's no such thing sentenciándose not to recognize the fallacy of their position. Stubbornly persist in their claims, believing that this will be contrasted to what happens today. Perhaps thinking that this will stop the course of matter in its evolutionary path. How are insipid and vain hopes. Well not understand that capitalism and its epistemology are discussed at the most crucial as his tenure as an economic system. Capitalism to continue still in force has had first become a corporate fascism, this in order to continue to maintain the perks and the accumulation of wealth at the expense of the exploitation of the least disadvantaged. The two main elements of democracy have corrupted and currently do not meet the moral purpose for which mankind was created. Sociology and whether all sciences which have their origin in Western philosophy heir to the Hellenistic and Roman thought, are in crisis, as well as capitalism. But why are in crisis? That's the question that in academic circles wonder. Although some dogmatic either side of the extreme right or the other side of the room intending to deny. In that denial mechanism to attempt to establish fascist methods do not give the debate. And if there is no debate, difficult will be to question their findings with the lucid presentation of ideas.

If we assume that science can not understand itself, especially to see the muddy road that has gotten, seeking a way out that will not see their morale dented scientific, to do this you have to resort to metascience, which is not science. What says Miguel MARTINEZ true science and its method is given for external objects but can not itself be known as an object of knowledge. By resorting to metascience, it is to be able to validate, affirm their concepts, but this may vary with evolutionary twists is giving the knowledge that is validated. Here constructs collapse of both the extreme right and those on the other end, they consider knowledge as immutable, not liable to evolve. Both sides believe that knowledge is like the recipe to which must be followed to the letter to get the desired result beforehand or that contained in the document title epistemological. Both ends are very according to the immutability of beings and things, believing that everything remains unchanged in centuries of centuries, we assume that adhere to Francis Fukuyama's assertion that gave order to the social evolution of man , in other words at the end of the historical. The same happens at the other end who believe that only a small part of nature is what can only evolve, the rest, it remains static both in its essence and in form. Even claiming that the guide is like a cookbook which must follow it to the letter and if you deviate to their own knowledge and reflection is demonized and thrown to the diaspora as vile element. This precisely is the classic behavior of corporatist fascism, and reason focuses on the reasoning of the market, what they preach and do as holy neoliberal dogma and clerical immutable. And is that both sides are in their dogmatism that democracy depends on public discussion excess. Therein lies the problem because both coincide maul ends this aspect of city life, since the characteristic of fascism thrives single thought and absence of behavior that are characterized as unfettered debate or any ideological frontier . Only when it is certain that the truth we hold contradictory argument does not resist, we will strive to who holds an argument that shakes or destroy our argument, resort to the disqualification of our adversary, without further argument that sometimes only the represents the argument to be more valid. But when we have the power, either the group or the state, we use that media violence is none other than the demonization of our opponent to have no one to confront the ideological debate.

If we begin to analyze the expressions, both Mr Guzman as Mr Varguitas, which are essentially anarcho fascists on one side of one end as the other. Both are scholars in different fields, but share the same anti-democratic behavior, but were touting as champions of spreading the culture of freedom. But at first glance, begin to recognize his talent discriminatory-I mean Don Marito-which asserts that there are matters of high intellectual level, so we assume then that there is low level, but it brings its origin or who knows and the article will have confirmed that the diary of the republic will be shown, we are not aware. In his article is when alludes trenches that does not correspond to the true reality, it describes a mess of gossips who have taken your own medicine, as neoliberal what they preach, so there is an ideological struggle antagonist if not the carve-up of social privileges.

The same applies to Mr. Guzman, who has become incendiary holder old system even though the champions of freedom, to exploit and murder-not consent to his side, they do not believe he has repented of questioning the rotten system that keep the population from which they call their homeland as Peru. But still with furrowed brow and participate in the electoral exclusion system, in which only those who have earned money and property, and is not a representation of the way Greek or Roman, who was represented by the wisest and most elderly, the mixture of wisdom and experience, virtue that Socrates mentions, but which now is the opposite. Who we represent? Most grained gangland territory, because we all like in a zoo. Here Guzman is a dreamer, as the underworld never want to mix with, for the purposes of Guzman already know and are not equal to those of Creole underworld is in our parliament nor the genocidal acts as President. And only the illusion lies with the metaphysical, we already know.

Juan Esteban Yupanqui Villalobos

http://juanestebanyupanqui.blogspot.com

domingo, 28 de abril de 2013

THE neoliberal dogmatism. (I)

THE neoliberal dogmatism. (I)

The dogmatism is based on a tautology. Each statement is self-sustaining. This can be seen in the theology that is the basis of religious dogmatism, whose verification only and is correct only in the sense of the individual soul, to hold a vacuum of scientific knowledge which suffers. Since he human being feels the need to sustain their existential vacuum, so we can confirm that religion is a human cultural creation. Therefore confirmation only feeling that makes the human being to hold their religious beliefs, which is called Faith But this feeling, known as faith, fills the existential void of human beings, in other words resolves a cultural necessity; so far we can say that it has resolved an issue which keeps it firmly dogmatic thinking of religion.If we go to the ideological field: bourgeois thought, holding economic and political thought of the bourgeoisie in its imperial phase, known as Neoliberal generated only exclusion, because in order to stand as a class have to appeal the systemic violence to overpower other and steal their resources, which it euphemistically termed as marketing, which has the same spirit that originated the concept of the market from the Greek peoples.


To go confirming each of the steps that you take the big bourgeoisie to again return to the old times of slavery, though ironically now call the market force that is nothing more than return the slave system, with other tricks , but in the end work is usurpation or removing the labor force to continue accumulating poorest economically to a small class worldwide, and countries to a petty bourgeoisie that behaves like the guardians in favor of the bourgeoisie world. To that end they use for some economic disaster led to introduce social reforms enabling them to take full control of an area or region in the world. Some clueless, such as journalist Cecilia Valenzuela, tells us that we should try it.


The first example of privatization came in the Pinochet dictatorship, but before the big bourgeoisie used to employees of the Central American intelligence to generate a coup in Chile in the government of Salvador Allende. Almost most post coup advisers came from Milton Friedman school or school of the Chicago Boys, who designed the future economic, social facto regime, including a new constitution according to the extent and interests multinationals, such as the dispossession of ancestral lands to indigenous peoples for the benefit of many multinationals that prey ecosystem, which of course have generated climate change was denied for many years because of the same disinformation campaigns of the multinationals. With the design of its policies of dispossession, first we precarizo working conditions to supposedly improve investments at par was privatized all state enterprises, selling them for a price far from its true value, which were multinationals important asset that grew the fortunes of their shareholders.


His greatest prey of course it was social security, thereby grossly swelled their income, which after a few years suffered a debacle, disaster that the state had to take to heal the damage of those affected. His other hand it was the privatization of education has generated enormous educational inside Chile, this has generated in Chile today a new generation of young people who woke up from the slumber that had all the economic political system in Chile that aided by the media, which are also in the hands of those who own the world, generating two different worlds within Chile:


A Chile presented to the world as developing, but there is another Chile who are coming, which are displaced from the wealth generated there. That although there was a small spring called democratic rulers and left, but were still ruling with the dictates imposed by imperialist ideology. It is to understand that imperialism and ideology to continue to maintain their power progressive forces infiltrated to continue staying in power in Chile is called Coalition, here you can Call Patria Roja or Citizens for Change, MAS. They are instructed to divert the just demands of the people, support the system and make impossible any real change. Therefore continue to maintain the system that causes the greatest inequalities that exists in this country and so do here indicated.


Juan Esteban Yupanqui Villalobos. April - 2013. 

http://juanestebanyupanqui.blogspot.com

Here I am...